Good News: A Change of Heart and an Updated Declaw Policy!
Remember the American Veterinarian Medical Foundation’s (AVMF) debacle of a contest to find “America’s Favorite Veterinarian” last month? Some good has come of it after all.
One of the top ten finalists – all but one of whom performed declaw surgeries upon request – has had a change of heart and has joined Dr. Richter in his refusal to perform onychectomy surgeries.
If you live anywhere within driving distance of Dr. Marcy Hammerle, of The Pet Doctor veterinary practice in O’Fallon, Missouri, you should start patronizing her clinic. She has become Missouri’s first vet (that we are aware of) to stop performing the barbaric practice of removing feline toe parts for owner convenience.
— Outstanding, Dr. Hammerle! You have my respect and admiration for stepping outside mainstream veterinarian practices and standing up for cats and their claws. Thank you! —
BREAKING UPDATE! Another veterinarian – who wishes not to be named at this point – has stepped up and made the choice to refuse declaw requests! This is wonderful news!
But wait, there’s more good news!
The American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA), which sets quality standards for veterinary clinics, just published a new and more strongly worded policy statement on declawing. One that is more aligned with the American Association of Feline Practitioner’s (AAFP) anti-declaw position statement and less like the AVMA’s insultingly weak stance.
Here is the full text of the AAHA’s official policy:
“The American Animal Hospital Association strongly opposes the declawing of domestic cats and supports veterinarians’ efforts to educate cat owners and provide them with effective alternatives.
Scratching is a normal feline behavior. Cats scratch to (1) condition their claws by removing old nail sheaths, (2) scent mark objects with the glands on their paws, (3) visually mark objects by leaving shredded matter as evidence, (4) stretch and exercise their forelegs, and (5) enjoy a pleasant sensation. Veterinarians must help cat owners to promote appropriate scratching behaviors by advising them to:
- Provide suitable implements for normal scratching behavior. Examples include scratching posts, cardboard boxes, lumber or logs, and carpet or fabric remnants affixed to stationary objects. Implements should be tall or long enough to allow full stretching, and be firmly anchored to provide necessary resistance to scratching.
- Place appropriate scratching objects near scratched furniture and make them more attractive than the furniture. Additionally, place scratching objects near resting areas so the cat can stretch and scratch after resting.
- Train cats through positive reinforcement (e.g., treats, use of catnip, verbal praise, etc.) to use the above implements.
- Trim cats’ nails every one to two weeks.
- Consider artificial nail caps.
- Avoid harm to themselves or cats by avoiding engaging in rough play.
Veterinarians are obliged to provide cat owners with complete education about declawing. The following points are the foundation for full understanding and disclosure regarding declawing:
- Declawing is not just removal of the claw; it is a major surgery involving amputation.
- Declawing is rarely a medically necessary procedure. There are inherent risks and complications with any surgical procedure, including, but not limited to, anesthetic complications, side effects associated with analgesics, hemorrhage, infection, and pain.
- The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not list declawing as a means of preventing disease in either healthy or immunocompromised individuals.
Declawing may warrant consideration as an alternative to relinquishment or euthanasia, but only after extensive education and presentation of other strategies to manage scratching behavior. Many declawed cats are still relinquished to shelters – declawing does not guarantee that cats will remain in households.
This statement does not apply to claw removal when medically necessary to treat conditions such as tumors or chronic infections. If declawing is performed, the procedure must follow current best practices for amputation including multi -modal pain control before, during, and for an appropriate length of time after the surgery.
AAHA believes the current data regarding behavioral issues following declaw is insufficient and will evaluate new scientific information as it becomes available.
Adopted by the American Animal Hospital Association Board of Directors, October 2003. Revised October 2009. Last revised August 2015.”
While not (yet) a ban on onychectomy surgeries, the new policy is acknowledgement – for the first time by a veterinarian organization – of two very key points:
1. Declawing does NOT keep cats in their homes.
2. Complications may well indeed afflict these cats as much as several years later.
AAHA’s declaw policy is not mandatory for its member hospitals but historically, these policies have generally been incorporated into their standards.
This is a great step forward. Let’s keep up the pressure my friends; America needs to join the rest of the civilized world in banning this cruel and inhumane practice! Cats deserve to keep their claws!
If you enjoyed this post or found it informative, please “Like” it, “Tweet” it, or share it using any of the buttons below. And don’t forget to check out our FB page, join the discussions in our awesome FB group and follow us on Twitter!
Glad some vets are coming to their senses!!! Hope more do the same
This statement actually adds very little to the facts or discussion in that it continues to “keep the door open” for the practice to continue: “declawing may warrant consideration as an alternative to relinquishment or euthanasia, but only after”…..etc, etc, etc,with the usual claim in the false belief that education and disclosure will be part of decision-making…which evidence shows DOES NOT HAPPEN; BTW it wouldn’t be “euthanasia” but sanctioning the KILLING of an otherwise HEALTHY cat! and such statements as …”the current data regarding behavioral issues following declawing is insufficient”……only adds to the obfuscation and is, in fact, erroneous in light of the fact that there is an enormous amount of documented evidence regarding the negative effects of declawing, both short and long-term.
Absolutely 100% agree with Tony Porcaro.
The AAHA is side stepping taking a stand, the only policy that gives the correct message is “We completely oppose declaw surgery except for medical necessities such as tumours or severe infection.
Having a policy which includes a ‘get out of jail free card’ such as “declawing may warrant consideration as an alternative to relinquishment or euthanasia, but only after” is really doing nothing to bring about change.
Thank you Dr. Hammerle for honoring your oath, to heal, help animals not cripple (declawing) & I’m hoping & praying other veterinarians will follow suite.